1.5 billion forced to rely on degraded land according to new report

The Achieving Food Security in the Face of Climate Change report was released recently by the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change. Containing seven key recommendations, the report stresses the importance of assisting vulnerable populations to adapt to climate change and food security issues. According to the report, multi-benefit farming systems like agroforestry should be encouraged to enable more productive and resilient livelihoods and ecosystems. Such practices are said to empower marginalized food producers to increase productivity when combined with strengthened land and water rights.

Among the statistics presentedin the report are that1.3 billion tonnes of food produced for consumption is wasted annually while losses due to events such as droughts are estimated at around 8 billion US dollars. Commissioner Chair, Professor John Beddington, says he is dismayed that despite the level of wastage, 1.5 billion people are still forced to depend on degraded land.

“We’ve seen in the last two or three years significant price spikes, following on decades of declines in real food prices. And those spikes have really presented real problems, exacerbating poverty. Something of the order of a hundred million people went into poverty following the 2007/8 price spike – another 40 or so million went into poverty after the 2010/11 price spike,” said Beddington.

With the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Durban (COP 17) less than two weeks away, the Commission says economic incentives will encourage smallholder farmers to partake in sustainable intensification of agriculture. Combined with stronger land tenure rights, the incentives are seen as important steps towards the prevention of further loss of forests and grasslands.

The Achieving Food Security in the Face of Climate Change report can be downloaded from here.

Teaching skills key to selection of a successful model farmer

A model farmer does not effectively train other farmers on new innovative farming methods if they do not possess appropriate dissemination skills, a recent study has found

Farmer trainers should be selected based on their interest and ability to teach others rather than on their successes in implementing farming techniques, shows a new study led by Steve Franzel, a scientist at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF).

In the study by Franzel, Charles Wambugu and Tutui Nanok, 126 adopters of fodder shrubs, fast-growing leguminous shrubs for feeding dairy cows, in Kenya took part in the study that found that 40% of expert farmers were not effective disseminators.

About 225,000 smallholder farmers in East Africa are growing fodder shrubs to increase their milk production. The overall impact of the shrubs in terms of additional net income from milk is high, at US$19.7 million to $29.6 million in Kenya alone over the past 15 years.

In most extension projects the model farmer is selected based on their expertise and how successfully they have been in attaining and in some cases superseding the desired results.

“This finding has great implications on how extension is practiced,” said Franzel. “It means that choosing a farmer to demonstrate and teach other farmers will only be as effective as their skills in passing on the information.”

The results of the study suggest that extension programs that choose farmer trainers on the basis of their farming expertise will not promote dissemination as effectively as those that choose trainers on the basis of their dissemination skills.

“I have helped my fellow farmers in improving their farming methods because I have been able to show them how much more milk I am producing thanks to the fodder shrubs. I have also been able to teach them how to increase milk production on their farms because I have had training on how to teach other farmers,” said Rose Wanjiku, one of the farmers who was part the study.

“Changing how we choose farmer trainers in this way would see more extension projects reap the full benefits of their work,” said Franzel, who was speaking at the ongoing, Innovations in Extension and Advisory Services: Linking Knowledge to Policy and Action Conference underway in Nairobi, Kenya.

This major international conference organized by the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) seeks to bolster faltering support for government agencies, private operators, and individuals who collectively provide a critical link in the field between agriculture knowledge holders and policy makers and millions of struggling smallholder farmers, in developing countries and more particularly in Africa.

Teaching skills key to selection of a successful model farmer

A model farmer does not effectively train other farmers on new innovative farming methods if they do not possess appropriate dissemination skills, a recent study has found

Farmer trainers should be selected based on their interest and ability to teach others rather than on their successes in implementing farming techniques, shows a new study led by Steve Franzel, a scientist at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF).

In the study by Franzel, Charles Wambugu and Tutui Nanok, 126 adopters of fodder shrubs, fast-growing leguminous shrubs for feeding dairy cows, in Kenya took part in the study that found that 40% of expert farmers were not effective disseminators.

About 225,000 smallholder farmers in East Africa are growing fodder shrubs to increase their milk production. The overall impact of the shrubs in terms of additional net income from milk is high, at US$19.7 million to $29.6 million in Kenya alone over the past 15 years.

In most extension projects the model farmer is selected based on their expertise and how successfully they have been in attaining and in some cases superseding the desired results.

“This finding has great implications on how extension is practiced,” said Franzel. “It means that choosing a farmer to demonstrate and teach other farmers will only be as effective as their skills in passing on the information.”

The results of the study suggest that extension programs that choose farmer trainers on the basis of their farming expertise will not promote dissemination as effectively as those that choose trainers on the basis of their dissemination skills.

“I have helped my fellow farmers in improving their farming methods because I have been able to show them how much more milk I am producing thanks to the fodder shrubs. I have also been able to teach them how to increase milk production on their farms because I have had training on how to teach other farmers,” said Rose Wanjiku, one of the farmers who was part the study.

“Changing how we choose farmer trainers in this way would see more extension projects reap the full benefits of their work,” said Franzel, who was speaking at the ongoing, Innovations in Extension and Advisory Services: Linking Knowledge to Policy and Action Conference underway in Nairobi, Kenya.

This major international conference organized by the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) seeks to bolster faltering support for government agencies, private operators, and individuals who collectively provide a critical link in the field between agriculture knowledge holders and policy makers and millions of struggling smallholder farmers, in developing countries and more particularly in Africa.

Innovative water harvesting by smallholder farmers

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}

Successful agricultural innovations commonly need to provide solutions to capturing water from scarce resources. An article by the Worldwatch Institute describes several methods smallholder farmers can use to harvest water. The author praises the World Agroforestry Centre for its catchment tank project saying “In Kenya, Maasai women are working with the U.N. Environment Programme and the World Agroforestry Centre to build rooftop catchment tanks, which provide water for their households and save women time collecting water”

It is estimated that the vast majority of cropland in sub-Saharan Africa dependson rainfall with only 4 percent of cultivated land using irrigation systems. Ultimately, by combining innovative ways of capturing rainwater with well-established irrigation systems, smallholder farmers will be better off.

The article encourages farmers to get the most out of rainwater by practising farming methods that maximise the use of plant moisture and water stored within soils. The authorsays “Rainwater harvesting using small earthen dams and other methods also helps maximize rainwater utility”.

Read more on Getting “More Crop Per Drop” to Strengthen Global Food Security here.

Getting behind climate-smart agriculture

Climate-smart Agriculture is becoming the term of choice to explain the shift away from energy intensive agricultural practices towards sustainable and carbon neutral agriculture. In an article in New Agriculturalist, organizations and individuals involved in promoting climate-smart agriculture were asked to give their professional opinion on a number of questions concerning the term. Questions touch on definitional issues, benefit sharing mechanisms, funding challenges and many more.

The preliminary question asked “what is climate smart agriculture?” to which many offered answers that referred to food security. The response from the Farming First coalition suggested that climate-smart agriculture is a way of primarily maximising farm output by combining all forms of best practise agriculture.

As with all other climate change projects, benefit sharing mechanisms will be very important to climate-smart agriculture. They ensure smallholder farmers profit from the carbon finance associated with climate-smart agriculture. Yasin Mahadi from Camco/Future Agriculture Consortium says “smallholders have small plots so they will not stand to gain from a possible carbon credit scheme unless they are properly accounted for in the planning stages of any climate-smart agriculture”

Although many questions remain unanswered, the message from the article is that climate-smart agriculture has something new to offer to the world. Some respondents suggested climate-smart agriculture is underpinned by a spirit of innovation and proactive change. This spirit is captured by Alberto Sandoval from FAO who says climate smart agriculture is transformational. Moreover, Ademola Braimoh from the World Bank sees the concept as best able to combine mitigation and adaptation approaches for dealing with climate change.

Read more of Climate smart agriculture here.

Page 5 of 86« First...«34567»102030...Last »

Translator

Anzeigen

Agroforst, Agroforstwirtschaft, Baumbeschreibungen, Bäume, Gründüngung, Hecken, Pflanzen, Agroforstprojekt am Schaalsee, Agroforstprojekt in Berlin, Agroforstprojekt Schönwalde